<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Loveclients Inc. &#187; blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.loveclients.com/tag/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.loveclients.com</link>
	<description>We really love search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Our Grand Predictions: Some Directions for Online Content in the Future</title>
		<link>http://blog.loveclients.com/2009/06/21/our-grand-predictions-some-directions-for-online-content-in-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.loveclients.com/2009/06/21/our-grand-predictions-some-directions-for-online-content-in-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall mcluhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.loveclients.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We look at the 'fall' of the newspaper and Marshall McLuhan and a whole bunch of other stuff, and predict what online content will look like in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-553" title="mcluhan book" src="http://blog.loveclients.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mcluhan-book.jpg" alt="mcluhan book" width="595" height="243" />The last few years have seen an absolute flood of thoughts and predictions on a future path for the written word. It is certainly true that <em>content is king</em> online. But as print continues to change (some say die, but hold that thought for a few years) and methods of content distribution become more and more advanced, the ways people get and pay for their content will change too. What kind of content will be <em>king</em> in the future? What will it look like, and how will people get it?</p>
<p>Obviously these questions matter for anyone trying to make money using different forms of content distribution, whether it be advertising in a local newspaper or taking out <a id="umr0" title="new ad space" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10264876-93.html" target="_blank">new ad space</a> on YouTube. But what matters even more is how these new forms will actually <em>affect</em> the content itself. Let&#8217;s look at a few recent ideas and see what they can tell us.</p>
<h3><strong>Marshall McLuhan Is Still Pretty Damn Important.</strong></h3>
<p>Now, if you remember nothing else from this pioneering Canadian media theorist, just take his most famous aphorism: &#8220;<em>the medium is the message</em>&#8220;. It&#8217;s since been tweaked and refuted and played with so many times as to lose some of its original meaning, but in general, you can take it to mean <strong>form affects (or <em>is</em>) content.</strong></p>
<p>Look at the Kindle, for example. The world&#8217;s biggest online bookseller has now entered the hardware game, creating a device that is designed to replace the very book form itself. And of course Amazon, being a huge seller of books, is hoping to control and monetize as much of the distribution method as possible. It&#8217;s very much along the lines of Apple&#8217;s iTunes store: create a device that a lot of people buy, then offer an elegant solution to sell content for that device.</p>
<h3><strong>Why Comparisons With the Music Industry Aren&#8217;t Always Perfect.</strong></h3>
<p>But comparisons with the music industry don&#8217;t work after a certain point: formats have changed quite frequently in the last several years, from vinyl-&gt;tape-&gt;CD-&gt;digital. Books have been the same for hundreds of years. So any time we get over-excited about the death of print, we need to step back and look at the longer view, like Dave Eggers <a href="http://therumpus.net/2009/06/the-rumpus-long-interview-with-dave-eggers/" target="_blank">suggests</a>:</p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">Well, there are still a billion books sold every year. And there are about a billion newspapers printed every day. I understand when people are worried about aspects of the business, and as a small and always struggling publisher, we worry at McSweeney’s too, but there’s an element of doomsaying that’s just premature. The Kindle, for example, has a comparatively tiny portion of the overall book sales, but I have friends who already assume that new books won’t even be printed on paper in a year or two. It’s kind of extreme, and it ignores a fair bit of reality.</div>
<p>Eggers has a point. But there are some <a id="n7ty" title="very convincing arguments to the contrary" href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/02/the-once-and-future-e-book.ars" target="_blank">very convincing arguments to the contrary</a>, and as Apple has proven, if a device good and useable enough comes out, enough people will buy one that it can change an entire industry in the course of a few years. But we do need to remember: <strong>completely ignoring print</strong> and assuming that a declining readership means a non-existent readership <strong>just isn&#8217;t a good idea</strong>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-554" title="old newspaper" src="http://blog.loveclients.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/old-newspaper.jpg" alt="old newspaper" width="595" height="259" /></p>
<h3><strong>A Microcosm For Us All: Intellectuals and Published Content.</strong></h3>
<p>A <a id="cfjn" title="recent argument" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27taylor.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=2" target="_blank">recent argument</a> has also been floating around about Masters and PhD dissertations, and how the cost of publishing them is nearly <em>always </em>prohibitive. The argument usually continues that the &#8216;book&#8217; form for academic argument is not always ideal; it has created the expectation that if a professor has something good to say on a subject, it must come in a minimum of 220 pages. While this might seem like a small corner of the publishing market, it&#8217;s actually a perfect microcosm of some bigger changes we might see in the future.</p>
<p>A long, read-by-no one dissertation is an antiquated notion. Don&#8217;t get me wrong—I&#8217;m sure it will continue for some time, but any progressive university is probably realizing that the whole &#8216;university publishing&#8217; business will have to change radically over the next several years.</p>
<h3><strong>The Delivery Method Starts Changing the Stuff Inside.</strong></h3>
<p>Here is where the dozens of options available for content publishing (the form, or medium) will begin to change the content itself. Once the necessary existential debates on the role of the academy and the importance of intellectual discourse are hashed out, we are going to be looking at a very different landscape, one where serious academic thought is not walled up in quarterly journals but actively distributed across a whole range of channels.</p>
<p>Many of these channels will not be conducive to a 220-page dissertation. Some will support, say, a 15-page essay, others might be wonderful for a short book (say 100 pages) on a particular subject, others only a brief article. But all of these options, and the various ways in which content creators, editors, and distributors will try and monetize this process is <strong>definitely going to change the content itself</strong>.</p>
<h3><strong>And Just Why Does This Matter to Us?</strong></h3>
<p>Simple: if you get too focused on creating quality content along a single model, the speed of innovation might take you for a loop. Things don&#8217;t change <em>so</em> fast that all your hard work will disappear in a moment, but if you are trying to improve your website&#8217;s SEO, build a brand online, or market your product through any kind of content creation, you <em>need to pay attention to how the mediums are changing</em>.</p>
<p>Just because Twitter has become insanely popular in the last 3 years doesn&#8217;t mean you need to scrap your print advertising budget and start tweeting incessantly. That would be quite useless. But it does mean you need to be conscious when something like a Twitter pops up, and suddenly a new 140-character format for content exists. Remember not to get <em>too comfortable</em> and you&#8217;ll stay on the right track.</p>
<h5>(photos by flickr users <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/peagreenchick/" target="_blank">peagreengirl</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/" target="_blank">cogdogblog</a>. Used under a creative commons license.)</h5>
<img src="http://blog.loveclients.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=549&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.loveclients.com/2009/06/21/our-grand-predictions-some-directions-for-online-content-in-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Title Tactics: Stuff that works</title>
		<link>http://blog.loveclients.com/2008/09/18/seo-title-tactics-stuff-that-works/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.loveclients.com/2008/09/18/seo-title-tactics-stuff-that-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local business ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.loveclients.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two kinds of titles that you should be thinking about: Your website and your Headline. Both can put you at the top of a search engine list if done right.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">There are two kinds of titles that you should be thinking about: Your web page title and your Headline Title.<span style="yes;">  </span>They can be separate or one in the same, depending on what kind of website/blog you have. <span style="yes;"> </span>Both can put you at the top of a search engine list if done right. <span style="yes;"> </span></span></span></p>
<p><img src="http://blog.loveclients.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/newsmap.png" alt="" width="595" height="270" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-244" /></p>
<p><strong>Website and Web Page Titles</strong><br />
Your website title is one of the first things that major search engines look for when ranking your page.  When your title and description accurately reflect your content, (which should also be fabulous,) it drastically improves the chances that your web page rank will rise like fresh baked blueberry muffins.  That’s not enough though.  You’ll also need a website title that’s noticeable and makes people want to know more and click through to your site.  </p>
<p><strong>Think local. </strong> If your business is in London, make a specific appeal to London and the surrounding area.  People all over the world will still want to view your website for its valuable information.  However, it makes good business sense to make a local appeal too since people are more comfortable making purchases from companies that are close by.  </p>
<p><strong>List your business name and some important keywords in your title.  </strong> Small and New businesses list keywords first. Larger and well known businesses can list their name before the keywords.  i.e.: A small business may write: Best gourmet coffee in Maine at Schmoe’s Joe.  While a larger company may say: Schmoe’s Joe: Best gourmet coffee in Maine. </p>
<p><strong>For every page on your website, use a different tagline with keywords </strong>that you know people will look for.  i.e.:  Schmoe’s Joe: About Our Gourmet Coffee Company, Schmoe’s Joe: Buy Gourmet Coffee Online, Schmoe’s Joe: Gourmet Coffee Accessories.</p>
<p><strong>Website titles should be as short as possible.</strong>  Don’t try to squeeze ten keywords in to one headline.  You are more likely to get better results with one or two quality keywords than you will with half a dozen of them.  This is mostly due to the fact that web surfers are looking for instant information.  They don’t typically read that much into a headline anyway.  In order to get lots of quality keywords associated with your site, use the method above and put a different keyword in the title of every page.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.loveclients.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/storm_headline.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="270" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-245" /></p>
<p><strong>Content, Blog and Article Headlines</strong><br />
According to <a href="http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/student/96_fall/caples/caplesadman.html">John Caples</a>, author of “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Advertising-Methods-Prentice-Business-Classics/dp/0130957011">Tested Advertising Methods</a>,” There are three major types of titles that attract the most clicks:</p>
<p>1) <strong>News Headlines:</strong><br />
It is human nature to seek out information and find out what is happening in their world.  News headlines offer objective facts which make readers feel more knowledgeable and in control of their environment.  Examples are: “Celebrity Searches Lead to Malware” “New Remote Application Available for iPhone and iPod” and “Buy New Wii at Discount Stores”</p>
<p>2) <strong>Curious Monkey:</strong><br />
Everyone has a little curious monkey inside their head distracting them from the task at hand and telling them to click on the video of the skateboarding dog.  Headlines like “Cat Declared Hero” “$80M Disaster” or “Bubble Boy Lives!” can get people’s attention pretty quickly.    </p>
<p>3) <strong>Self Interests: </strong><br />
This is the most effective since readers are interested in things and ideas that they will personally benefit from.  It appeals to a need, a want or an ego.  For instance: “Learn Spanish in Two Weeks” “Retire Ten Years Early” or “Affordable Mansions”</p>
<p>When appealing to the “self-interest” spectrum, beware of overuse.  Consumers and web surfers have become fairly desensitized to marketing and advertising on the internet, if not extremely wary and cynical.  Over-sell it and they may think you’re a scam operation.  There needs to exist a delicate balance between a quality product and an intelligent, subtle yet strong appeal to their ego and desire.  It all comes down to finding what kind of tone your demographic responds to.  Do they want something edgy and fresh, subtle and intelligent, or maybe they are more likely to click on a headline that is funny and bizzare</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.loveclients.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/bluecollage.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="270" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-246" /> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">Remember, you don&#8217;t have to be #1 on the search engine&#8217;s list to get the most clicks.  It&#8217;s better to have a few high quality keywords and an appealing headline than a title that is too vague or contains too much information.</span></p>
<img src="http://blog.loveclients.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=243&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.loveclients.com/2008/09/18/seo-title-tactics-stuff-that-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
